Fifty Shades
Description
Vocal Characteristics
Language
EnglishVoice Age
Middle Aged (35-54)Accents
North American (General)Transcript
Note: Transcripts are generated using speech recognition software and may contain errors.
50 shades of boring 50 shades of grey was all wrong. That supposed business Titan was an obvious fraud when he was at work at his desk. He was bored, drumming his fingers, irritated Lee on his desk, worried about some trist with some chick. Do you think somebody like that could do so much as finish a term paper, let alone build an industrial empire? And the fraud didn't end there? The actor obviously wasn't interested in women, and his character wasn't either. But he was not miscast far from it. He was perfect for that role because the character wasn't interested in women, either, because nobody who wants to have sex with a woman has to drop a legal contract first. That's what you do if you don't like women. As for all the bondage and SNM that sounds sexual and uninhibited, but it's the very opposite. That is, the behavior of someone who doesn't want to sex the girl. Instead of screwing her, he has her tied up to various machines, all of which spares him from having any involvement in the process. We're seeing barrier after barrier of his own making between him and the woman legal documents, contraptions, ritual observances, all of which drain the sex act of sexuality. Or rather, it is that there is no sexuality there to begin with. And all of these externalities are there to create the appearance of sexuality where there is none. There is an exterior but no interior. And that's what this movie is about. It's about creating the appearance of sexuality where there is none. But there is more the male character with snippy, petty and ill willed and weak. Remember when he yelled at that Hispanic gentleman? That was smallness. How is that erotic? He wasn't some brooding anti Romeo. He wasn't masculine or sexual. What he was was a bureaucrat and officious, legalistic bureaucrat. He was a bureaucrat and therefore dead inside. And this movie appealed to bureaucrats to female bureaucrats who wanted others to believe that they were still alive and had sexuality. Nay, kinky over the top sexuality. But they don't and what they take for sexuality is a corporatization stick, legalistic mimic re thereof. The reason 50 shades of grey was such a commercial success isn't that it was good. It wasn't not in any way. The dude was a mannequin and the chick was an attractive and she had no attraction inside her. She had hate, insider is what she had. She wasn't some fun free spirit. She wasn't some boho pottery maker. She was a bitter spinster staring into the bog of her own hagwood. And the company was a sham. No product or service identified. Just a big desk for a big dummy, a wax dummy with a Ken doll **** so wide. The book and movie do so well financially because most people are bureaucrats. M bureaucrats hate being bureaucrats the way the dead hate being dead and 50 shades of grey gave them away to appear to be alive, except that it only made them look more dead, since it externalized their sexuality and showed it to be the legalistic nothingness that it is. Bureaucrats can feel pain and they can inflict pain, and that's the only thing that makes them feel alive. And that's what the movie is about. Bureaucrats get revenge on the living by legalizing vitality into oblivion with useful artifices exactly what the guy in the movie was doing. He hated how he could feel. Nothing hated how nothing could turn him on. So he had to torture women instead of screwing them. Not that the chick didn't deserve torture. She was awful, too. I couldn't make it through the whole movie. I only got to the part where they were drawing up the pre sex legal contracts. The point was clear enough. Nobody who's alive inside liked that movie. Know that and use it as a litmus test.