After sitting down to watch a 31-minute documentary without any narration whatsoever I came to the conclusion that films without narration are incredibly difficult to digest.
Something was obviously missing and I tell you, it was painful!
Is narration necessary in film? Let’s find out.
Algonquin Provincial Park

Remember those hour-long documentaries made by National Geographic with the animals going about their business?
How about the numerous historical programs on A&E and TLC?

What would happen if you were to strip them of their narration? It would be catastrophic, wouldn’t it?
This evening, there was nothing on TV and we were out of LOST DVD episodes so I clicked around to find a documentary from our cable provider to watch. Thirty-one minutes of natural splendor featuring Algonquin Provincial Park was calming and tranquil, yet as I said before, something was missing. It didn’t take long for me to realize that the documentary I was watching didn’t have a narrator and that fact made me uncomfortable.

I realized just how integral speech and narration is to someone who is watching a film or documentary.

The steady voice of a trained narrator provides many things, including:

• balance
• structure
• an anchor
• a touchstone
• verbal perspective
• interpretation
• intelligence
• window into the writer’s mind

Another surprising aspect of this experiment proved that although beautiful, splendorous and serene, the film was not able to keep my undivided attention, partially because I was so distracted by the fact that there was not a narrator. I desired the companionship of a narrator and wanted someone to comment on what I was seeing to affirm my interpretation of the film… but most of all, I needed someone to speak to break the solitude — to share the moment.

Watching the film in complete silence (with the exception of some nature sounds and music) seemed too private and intimate, almost like I was intruding on the filmmaker and his crew.
Having a narrator on board is kind of like a nod in your direction giving you permission to partake in what is going on. They invite you in and encourage you to journey with them as the story unfolds on the screen.

People like narrators because a narrator provides security. They can spur on new thoughts, segue eloquently when required and persuasively convey emotion using the most powerful and innately wonderful tool in humanity’s communicative arsenal — the human voice.
How important is narration to you?
Leave a comment sharing your thoughts.
Best wishes,

Technorati Tags: Narrators, Narration, Documentaries, Film, Narrator, Voice Actors, and

©©© Elisseeva

Previous articleRandy Thomas and Peter Rofe Workshop in Florida this April
Next article“Cool” Anonymity Factor of Voice Over
Stephanie Ciccarelli is the Co-Founder and Chief Brand Officer of Classically trained in voice, piano, violin and musical theatre, as well as a respected mentor and industry speaker, Stephanie graduated with a Bachelor of Musical Arts from the Don Wright Faculty of Music at the University of Western Ontario. Possessing a great love for imparting knowledge and empowering others, her podcast Sound Stories serves an audience that wants to achieve excellence in storytelling. Stephanie is found on the PROFIT Magazine W100 list three times (2013, 2015 and 2016), a ranking of Canada's top female entrepreneurs, and is the author of Voice Acting for Dummies®.


  1. Watching a documentary without narration is like touring a museum without a tour guide. Or like exploring an historic battlefield without a park guide. You walk around thinking, “This is really interesting. Very cool,” but you have no idea what you’re looking at, what its origins are, its history, etc. So you get some exercise and scenery, but there’s a key ingredient missing in your experience.
    An historic example is an experiment that proved people need narration: 1980 NFL game between the Jets and Dolphins – the network ran the game with no announcers. There is a reason that one of the announcers is called the “color man.” Without voices, the show is “colorless.”

  2. Narration for what you watched was necessary. I recently saw a show on the History Channel on Al Capone’s St Valentine’s Day Massacre. The narrator had a heavy Italian accent which I thought was perfect for that show. How does the History Channel hire their voices as they are a place I would like to use my voice talents someday.
    Dan Gorham

  3. Hi Scott, Elisa, Stephanie and Dan,
    Thank you for your comments! I appreciate hearing your thoughts.
    Dan, there has been narration work for various channels hired through so I know that the producers do come here to post their jobs or contact talent directly. I suggest optimizing your website to let people know that you are a narrator and the kind of reads you specialize in. If you have an agent, they also might be able to help.

  4. From your blog-
    “Calming and tranquil”…”Thirty-one minutes of natural splendor…” , yet it was somehow diminished by an implied need for human noise in the background.
    Based on your description this was presented as an aesthetic piece, not a “documentary” (as your blog writing conflated it with). Perhaps the originators of the piece expected it to be taken as-is.
    If a presentation of something as beautiful as this cannot be grasped without someone giving a “play by play” narration I would suspect the problem is on the part of the viewer, not the presenter.
    [On screen, Picture of tree 1:30- 1:33]
    Narrator: Look at the beautiful tree. This is a tree, you know… what a nice tree…
    Every aspect of life does not require elaboration by a paid talking head. It’s a shame the originator of the visual piece was not given an opportunity to state their side of this issue. The piece, based on your description, was meant to reach something within us that goes beyond words. I’m saddened by the realization that the concept is so hard to grasp.
    Yes, there was no revenue garnered by a voice actor with this piece. I did not notice the world collapsing on itself as a consequence.

  5. You’re right Stephanie that a documentary without narration is like a boat without a rudder or sails to guide it and give it the feel needed. Like a great guitarist without a bass player.
    I watch documentaries on organized crime,and they use the same people for them. It makes you feel secure, and they segue into important parts in a way that emphasizes it in away that
    makes you want to learn and understand the material in away you can use in your life.
    I’m going to put the link up on my site Stephanie. VO artists will learn from it and and see another way to provide value doing VO work.

  6. Nonsense – with all due respect –

    Grey Gardens
    the moon and the Sledgehammer
    Fire at Sea.

    if you get it right I think they can be far more powerful without any narrator.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here